Feeling Is First
[ad_1]
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessEssay
Department of Art and Art History, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX 78712, USA
Arts 2024, 13(2), 49; https://doi.org/10.3390/arts13020049 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 12 December 2023
/
Revised: 22 February 2024
/
Accepted: 24 February 2024
/
Published: 28 February 2024
Abstract
Within the fields of aesthetics and psychology, there is a long tradition of arguing that affect precedes cognition. A verbalized thought following upon a feeling and associated with it does not translate the feeling precisely or adequately. In fact, as C. S. Peirce would argue, the thought itself projects its own affect, which is independent of its logic. The essence of affect or feeling will always elude linguistic capture. This essay argues that experiences of belief and doubt are affective sensations, and both can be graphed on a scale of sensuous intuition or cognitive guessing (which, again, projects affect). The failure of language to grasp what we refer to as instances of emotion, feeling, sensation, affect, belief, doubt, and the like is more of an intractable problem for philosophical aesthetics than it is for the aesthetics of the art experience. Examples of the art of Cy Twombly, Barnett Newman, Donald Judd, Bridget Riley, and Katharina Grosse are invoked to argue through the gap between thought and feeling.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Shiff, R.
Feeling Is First. Arts 2024, 13, 49.
https://doi.org/10.3390/arts13020049
Shiff R.
Feeling Is First. Arts. 2024; 13(2):49.
https://doi.org/10.3390/arts13020049
Chicago/Turabian Style
Shiff, Richard.
2024. “Feeling Is First” Arts 13, no. 2: 49.
https://doi.org/10.3390/arts13020049
Article Metrics
Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
[ad_2]