Investigation of the Growth and Mortality of Bacteria and Synechococcus spp. in Unvegetated and Seagrass Habitats
[ad_1]
1. Introduction
In coastal waters, seagrass meadows are common. Their presence enhances biodiversity by increasing habitat complexity and ecological niches [1,2]. Organic and inorganic matter are deposited by seagrass when the current velocity and wave action are reduced [3]. Furthermore, studies on the effects of seagrass have found that epiphytes and seagrass are the main organic carbon producers [4]. Some evidence suggests that seagrass contributes 50% of the total gross primary productivity of the open bay site [5]. Lindeboom and Sandee [6] found that epiphytes within seagrass communities contribute 36% to the gross primary productivity of these habitats. Consequently, a large percentage of the primary production in seagrass meadows is unavailable to predators for consumption and is converted into detritus [7]. In addition, a large fraction of photosynthesized compounds are released as dissolved organic matter (DOM) [8], which is the primary source of organic matter and energy for free-living heterotrophic bacteria. The bioavailable DOM is released by seagrass roots as well as by the leaves, making it available to heterotrophic bacteria in both pelagic and benthic habitats [9]. Although seagrass and microbes are linked, they are rarely examined together in coastal waters, despite their obvious biological importance.
DOM is metabolically the most significant source of carbon and nutrients for heterotrophic bacteria [10]. Previous studies suggested that DOM is partly derived from phytoplankton [11,12]. Furthermore, as coastal vegetation is dominated by seagrass ecosystems with high productivity, seagrasses play a crucial role in biogeochemical fluxes [13]. The effects of these DOM sources on degradation pathways are unknown, but a study found that organic matter sources might have a significant impact on bacterial carbon metabolism [14]. In an early study, it was reported that the abundance of bacteria in seagrass beds was approximately ten times higher than that without seagrass [15]. While growing, seagrass secretes DOM into the water, which can be used by algae and bacteria, facilitating carbon transfer from dissolved particles [16]. Accordingly, changes in the relative contribution of phytoplankton and macrophytes to DOM can affect carbon flux in marine food webs, especially via microbes [10,17]. In addition, bacterial abundance and metabolism in aquatic ecosystems are mainly constrained by the availability of resources (bottom-up control) and mortality by protistan grazers and viruses (top-down control) [18,19,20]. However, to date, few studies have examined bacterial mortality, especially the relative contributions of grazing and viral lysis to bacterial communities in seagrass environments [21]. Our understanding of the factors constraining microbial plankton stocks and activity in coastal seagrass regions remains limited. An accurate measure of bacterial growth and mortality is essential for understanding and quantifying the carbon cycle in seagrass-dominated ecosystems.
Furthermore, competition for resources among phytoplankton and seagrasses is highlighted in the conceptual framework. In the ocean, Synechococcus spp. comprise the largest portion of the prokaryotic picophytoplankton, generating a substantial fraction of the total primary production. There is some evidence that Synechococcus spp. contribute a significant portion (>50%) of phytoplankton biomass and production [22]. As autotrophic organisms, Synechococcus spp. compete with seagrass for inorganic nutrients and light for growth. In a report on seagrass ecosystems, the abundance of Synechococcus spp. was low compared with other ecosystems [23]. Moreover, other studies have shown the effects of seagrass on Synechococcus spp., which showed a decrease in Synechococcus spp. following contact with an ecosystem of seagrass, likely due to grazing control [24]. In addition, seagrass leaves directly trapped natural picophytoplankton populations, resulting in negative net rates of population growth in the presence of seagrass. Although the growth rate of picophytoplankton was high, the biomass of picophytoplankton remained low, perhaps because of the high removal of picophytoplankton by seagrass leaves [25].
This study was conducted with a benthic chamber to examine how seagrass environments affect bacterial and Synechococcus spp. growth and mortality rates. The relative effects of seagrass on bacterial and Synechococcus spp. growth and mortality rates were investigated in benthic chambers with and without seagrass. The following hypotheses were tested in this study: (i) incubation with seagrass resulted in higher bacterial growth rates because seagrasses release more DOM during photosynthesis and (2) Synechococcus spp. compete with seagrass for inorganic nutrients, which resulted in a relatively low growth rate of Synechococcus sp. We aim to learn more about the interaction between seagrass and other microbes (especially bacteria and picophytoplankton), as well as how we can improve our understanding of ecosystem processes.
4. Discussion
When seagrass is present in a soft sediment environment, it increases its physical complexity, which will have a significant impact on the local environment compared with its surroundings. Furthermore, a seagrass ecosystem is essential for coastal carbon cycling because it balances coastal carbon and buffers regional ocean acidity. By studying bacterial and Synechococcus spp. growth and loss in seagrass ecosystems, we can calculate ocean carbon flux and find clues to unknown carbon sinks. In this study, we investigated different changes in bacterial and Synechococcus spp. growth and mortality (grazing versus virus-induced mortality) in benthic chambers with and without seagrass. In this study, the net growth rate of bacteria was higher in the seagrass chambers than in the non-seagrass chambers. Furthermore, the growth rate of Synechococcus spp. was negative and calculated to be −0.90 d−1 in seagrass chambers. Using the modified dilution technique, we determined that grazing was the only significant source of bacterial and Synechococcus spp. mortality at that time.
In the original dilution protocol, phytoplankton grazing rates were determined by nutrient amendments, ensuring that the dilution effect was not affecting phytoplankton growth rates [30]. The efficacy of this part of the procedure, especially in the modified method that also considers viral mortality, has been questioned in some recent studies. The addition of nutrients to oligotrophic environments stimulated microzooplankton-induced mortality rates of cyanobacteria, which led to the overestimation of microzooplankton grazing rates. This probably resulted from improving food quality in cyanobacterial cells. Nutrient addition was also shown to increase viral burst size, which in turn led to an increase in viral production [31], resulting in an overestimation of viral-induced mortality. Kimmance and Brussaard [32] also advise against adding nutrients to dilution experiments because of the potential for unnatural growth rates. Therefore, nutrition was not added to the incubations in this study.
This manuscript concludes that all virus-mediated effects are non-significant, which is one of the most important results of the analysis. The low levels of lysis in environments may be explained by the confounding effects of viral infections on the growth and mortality of bacteria and Synechococcus spp. Furthermore, an appropriate incubation period must be determined for a regression curve to have a significant slope. The duration of the viral latent period is determined by not only the growth rate of the bacteria or picophytoplankton but also by the time between viral contact and lysis of the bacteria or picophytoplankton. The duration of incubation used in our study of 24 h is a critical aspect to consider. In previous studies, it has been shown that the lytic period of bacteriophages and cyanophages varies considerably, but most are associated with 24 h [33]. Because the incubation period is relatively long, it is possible that conditions were altered during incubation, resulting in substrate limitations as well as changes in bacterial and viral abundances. An important factor for the detection of virus-mediated effects in modified dilution assays is the duration of incubation. In addition, viruses and grazers appear to interact very complexly, potentially leading to antagonistic or synergistic effects on picoplankton [34]. It has been shown that nanoflagellates, through direct consumption of viruses or by grazing preferentially on viral-infected cells, can reduce viral abundance and infectivity [35].
Seagrass affects microbial communities according to the hydrodynamics and concentrations of organic matter and nutrients in a given environment. In the process of growing seagrass, the seagrass secretes DOM into the water, which bacteria can use to convert dissolved carbon into particle carbon [16,23]. There has been considerable evidence of bacterial abundance and production in seagrass ecosystems [15,36]. The abundance of bacteria found in seagrass beds is approximately ten times higher than that found in regions without seagrass [15]. In addition, 2–11% of the organic carbon produced by seagrass roots and rhizomes can be consumed by bacteria during photosynthesis [36]. Furthermore, organic carbon from sources outside the seagrass community can also increase bacterial productivity [36]. In the present study, we found that, at the onset of incubation, the average total heterotrophic bacterial abundance was 5.1 ± 0.9 and 3.7 ± 0.5 × 105 cells mL–1 in seagrass and non-seagrass chambers, respectively. Seagrass habitats also demonstrated a slightly higher net growth rate for bacteria than non-seagrass habitats (Figure 6A). This result supports our hypothesis, which is that seagrass releases more DOM during photosynthesis; therefore, incubation with seagrass leads to higher bacterial growth rates. However, a recent study in Florida Bay examined benthic and pelagic autotrophic communities to better understand the sources of organic matter for bacteria [37]. This study suggests that bacteria select carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus-rich organic matter that is readily available and similar to themselves. It was found that pelagic bacteria were tightly coupled to phytoplankton biomass and expended the greatest amount of extracellular enzyme effort to meet the carbon requirement of seagrass; however, seagrass production and nutrient content were unrelated to pelagic bacteria activity [37]. We observed that the growth rates of bacteria were higher in seagrass treatments, whereas Synechococcus spp. had a negative growth rate, which was calculated to be −0.90 d−1. In this regard, phytoplankton sources of DOM contribute to bacterial growth rates in a minor manner. The differences in these areas may be related to the different organic matter compositions and availability.
An important component of the functioning of seagrass ecosystems is the interaction between seagrass meadows and the water column [25]. Seagrass beds, for example, play an important role in early diagenesis in superficial sediments [38], and this has a significant effect on the flux of nutrients at the sediment–water interface, affecting water column primary production. According to this research, Synechococcus spp. have a negative growth rate in seagrass chambers. There is most likely nutrient competition between seagrasses and pelagic primary producers to explain the negative growth rate of Synechococcus spp. According to previous studies, benthic microalgae and seagrasses obtained nutrients from sediment pore waters and the water column [39]. Seagrasses can also take up nutrients from sediment, which helps maintain high production rates in water with nutrient scarcity [40]. Water column nutrients are also useful for benthic microalgae in overcoming nutrient limitations, as suggested by Rizzo et al. [41].
It may be possible to speculate about possible explanations for the variation in the growth of bacteria and Synechococcus spp. in seagrass meadows and non-vegetated areas from the present study. In the seagrass meadow environment, two major carbon sources are most likely to support bacterial growth. The extracellular release of DOC by phytoplankton occurs during photosynthesis (DOC1). The DOC released by seagrasses during photosynthesis is shown in DOC2 (Figure 8). A difficult aspect of this study was estimating the percentage of primary productivity from phytoplankton or seagrass that contributed to bacterial productivity in seagrass environments. Further, there should be more DOC concentration in the seagrass region, and the results from the seagrass chambers confirm this conclusion. During the study period, seagrass chambers had slightly higher DOC concentrations than non-seagrass chambers (Figure 7). When nutrient supply rates are low or moderate, seagrasses take up inorganic nitrogen and inorganic phosphorus through their leaves, competing with phytoplankton in the water column for nutrients (Figure 8).
Moreover, seagrass leaves also trap natural picophytoplankton populations. As a result, the seagrass canopy caused negative net growth rates of picophytoplankton [42]. According to Cummins et al. [42], picophytoplankton growth rates were negatively impacted by seagrass leaves after 2 h of incubation. This study also showed that in chambers without seagrass leaf controls, the net growth rates of natural picophytoplankton populations remained positive. In this study area, our results indicate that this mechanism is also a significant loss process for picophytoplankton.
In summary, the present study was designed to compare the growth and mortality rates of bacteria and Synechococcus spp. in different habitats (treatments with and without seagrass) in the chambers. A consistent difference in the growth of bacteria and Synechococcus spp. was found between non-seagrass and seagrass habitats. In seagrass chambers, bacterial growth was higher than that in non-seagrass chambers, suggesting that organic carbon coming from outside the seagrass community may increase bacterial growth. Furthermore, the growth rate of Synechococcus spp. was significantly lower in the seagrass treatment than in the non-seagrass treatment, so there is most likely nutrient competition between seagrasses and primary producers to explain the lower growth rate of Synechococcus sp. Because small-scale chambers are important for understanding the processes that produce and maintain spatial and temporal patterns of picoplankton, experiments designed to test hypotheses related to growth and mortality may be most effective. Furthermore, future studies will examine the scales of spatial variation in picoplankton growth in both field habitats. Additionally, Blue Carbon strategy management aims to enhance CO2 sequestration and reduce greenhouse gases through the management of coastal vegetation, particularly seagrass meadows. While seagrass meadows have recently been recognized as important marine carbon stores, there remains a lack of data on how habitat restoration can increase carbon sinks and stocks in coastal waters. This study provides evidence for the potential of seagrass habitat to enhance carbon available by bacteria and bacterial production will be transferred to higher trophic levels by grazing in the coastal zone. There is a possible impact on the fate and cycling of organic matter in our study region due to this shift.
[ad_2]
