User talk:Wolvesfan77: Difference between revisions

{{unblock reviewed|reason=How and when was i making disruptive edits.[[User:Wolvesfan77|Wolvesfan77]] ([[User talk:Wolvesfan77#top|talk]]) 18:18, 6 April 2024 (UTC)|decline=You persistently add unsourced information after being warned not to and given advice about learning to source information. You have edit warred. Good block. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 18:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed|reason=How and when was i making disruptive edits.[[User:Wolvesfan77|Wolvesfan77]] ([[User talk:Wolvesfan77#top|talk]]) 18:18, 6 April 2024 (UTC)|decline=You persistently add unsourced information after being warned not to and given advice about learning to source information. You have edit warred. Good block. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 18:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)}}

== Unblock me ==

{{unblock|reason=i wasn’t doing any disruptive edits. [[User:Wolvesfan77|Wolvesfan77]] ([[User talk:Wolvesfan77#top|talk]]) 18:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)}} [[User:Wolvesfan77|Wolvesfan77]] ([[User talk:Wolvesfan77#top|talk]]) 18:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Wolvesfan77, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Zane Maloney did not conform to Wikipedia’s verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome!  14 novembre (talk) 12:59, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry i don’t know who to source so i just have someone else do it for me Wolvesfan77 (talk) 13:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please learn at WP:HOWTOCITE before continuing to add content, especially to biographies of living people. Cerebral726 (talk) 17:57, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wolvesfan77! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of 2023 Las Vegas Grand Prix several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you’re aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:2023 Las Vegas Grand Prix, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Cerebral726 (talk) 17:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn’t edit warring. the rules state i can’t edit more then 3 times a day. I edited once yesterday. That isn’t edit warring Wolvesfan77 (talk) 17:27, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The WP:3RR does not allow you to continue to slowly edit war your preferred version into the page by coming back once a day and reverting. Please familiarize yourself with the Wikipedia:Edit warring before continuing, and in the future, try to gain consensus for a reverted edit. You should consider following WP:BRD as a guide. Cerebral726 (talk) 17:53, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I not trying to edit war. I just can’t stand people who edit pages without correct grammer. and i haven’t touched that page since yesterday Wolvesfan77 (talk) 18:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Zane Maloney. Thank you. Cerebral726 (talk) 17:55, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do you refrence articles. I don’t know how to do that Wolvesfan77 (talk) 18:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wolvesfan77, please see a citation guide and the reliable sources guideline. Citing sources is very important when editing biographies of living persons. —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 18:02, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If i send you the source name will you add it please Wolvesfan77 (talk) 18:19, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i am currently adding the sources and redoing what i edited. Please check if i did it right and tell me Wolvesfan77 (talk) 22:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:RadiationRaptor. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 23:19, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that guy was really getting on my nerves Wolvesfan77 (talk) 23:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That’s not an excuse. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 23:44, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wolvesfan77!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don’t be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It’s normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don’t worry if you don’t understand everything at first—it’s fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article’s talk page. Be civil, and don’t restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jak Crawford, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:59, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators’ noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The relevant section is #Problematic user. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 23:04, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Explain what the problem is Wolvesfan77 (talk) 23:08, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Make your case at ANI. I couldn’t care less about the situation, I just happened upon it. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 23:13, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is it releated to this page Wolvesfan77 (talk) 23:14, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It’s related to 2023–24 EFL Championship. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 23:15, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh proberly that annoying guy make false edits repeatedly. Wolvesfan77 (talk) 23:17, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it has nothing to do with me so that is good Wolvesfan77 (talk) 23:18, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you were violating the three-revert rule, so yes, this also involves you. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 23:19, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On the page 2023-24 EFL Championship, Rotherham United have the (R) which means relegated but they can still survive. They are 18 points behind Plymouth with 18 left so they can survive. Can someone fix that page please. Wolvesfan77 (talk) 16:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Thomas Tuchel, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok boomer Wolvesfan77 (talk) 17:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia’s guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 18:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Wolvesfan77 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing “blocking administrator” with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=i wasn't doing any disruptive edits. [[User:Wolvesfan77|Wolvesfan77]] ([[User talk:Wolvesfan77#top|talk]]) 18:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=i wasn't doing any disruptive edits. [[User:Wolvesfan77|Wolvesfan77]] ([[User talk:Wolvesfan77#top|talk]]) 18:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=i wasn't doing any disruptive edits. [[User:Wolvesfan77|Wolvesfan77]] ([[User talk:Wolvesfan77#top|talk]]) 18:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Wolvesfan77 (talk) 18:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]