Correction: Sundermann, A.; Fischer, D. How Does Sustainability Become Professionally Relevant? Exploring the Role of Sustainability Conceptions in First Year Students. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5155

[ad_1]

The authors would like to make the following corrections about the published paper [1]. The changes are as follows:
(1)

Replacing the “All 14 different major subjects offered at the university were represented (n = 1294)” in the Section 3.3 “Sample” on page 10.

All 11 major subjects from one B.A. study program and three teacher training study programs offered at the university were represented (n = 1294).

(2)

Authors Replacing: Authors would like to change 18 parts of the table content, so we need to replace the original Table 3 in Section 3.3 “Sample” on page 10:

Table 3.
Sample distributions.

Table 3.
Sample distributions.

Pilot Study Present Study
N % N %
Total Sample 1740 100.00 2730 100.00
Response (Rate) 913 52.00 1364 49.90
Sex
Female 558 61.11 477 34.97
Male 304 33.29 258 18.91
Not indicated 51 0.06 73 5.35
Age 1244 91.20
Study program
B.A. Teaching and Learning 111 12.16 242 17.74
B.A. Social Education 32 3.50 57 4.18
B.A. Business Education 27 2.96 48 3.52
Major subject
Business Administration 156 17.09 214 15.69
Business Information systems 23 2.52 58 4.25
Cultural Science 202 22.12 198 14.52
Digital Media 0.00 25 1.83
Economics 20 2.19 34 2.49
Environmental Science* 105 11.50 179 13.12
Studium Individuale 16 1.75 33 2.42
Industrial Engineering 42 4.60 43 3.15
Business Law 70 7.67 43 3.15
Political Science 18 1.97 32 2.35
(Organizational) Psychology 73 8.00 88 6.45
Total 895 98.30 1289 94.50

Table 3.
Sample distributions.

Table 3.
Sample distributions.

Pilot Study Present Study
N % N %
Total Sample 1740 100.00 2730 100.00
Response (Rate) 913 52.47 1364 49.96
Sex
Female 558 61.11 851 62.39
Male 304 33.29 440 32.26
Not indicated 51 5.60 73 5.35
Age 1244 91.20
Teacher Training Study Programs
B.A. Teaching and Learning 111 12.16 242 17.74
B.A. Social Education 32 3.50 57 4.18
B.A. Business Education 27 2.96 48 3.52
B.A. General (Major Subjects)
Business Administration 156 17.09 214 15.69
Business Information systems 23 2.52 58 4.25
Cultural Science 202 22.12 198 14.52
Digital Media 0.00 25 1.83
Economics 20 2.19 34 2.49
Environmental Science * 105 11.50 179 13.12
Studium Individuale 16 1.75 33 2.42
Industrial Engineering 42 4.60 43 3.15
Business Law 70 7.67 43 3.15
Political Science 18 1.97 32 2.35
(Organizational) Psychology 73 8.00 88 6.45
Missing 18 1.97 70 5.14
Total 913 100.00 1364 100.00
(3)

Deleting two sentences in Section 4.1 “Descriptive Statistics for Independent Variables” on page 11.

  • Median values have been compared with Wilcoxon ranked sign test for paired samples because the scores for environmental (D (1.154) = 0.20, p < 0.001), sociocultural (D (1.154) = 0.11, p < 0.001) and economic dimensions of sustainability conceptions (D (1.154) = 0.10, p < 0.001) were deviating significantly from normal.

  • All median values were significantly different (p < 0.001) and effect sizes varied from r = 0.57 to r = 0.36.

(4)

Adding a new paragraph in Section 4.1 “Descriptive Statistics for Independent Variables” on page 11 as the last paragraph of the section:

Median values have been compared with the Wilcoxon ranked sign test for paired samples because the scores for environmental, sociocultural and economic dimensions of sustainability conceptions were deviating significantly from normal, as indicated by the Shapiro-Wilk test (all p < 0.001). The Wilcoxon ranked sign test indicated that the medians were significantly different (ZEcon/Env = −27.76, r = −0.82; ZEnv/Soccul = −24.09, r = −0.71; ZEcon/Soccul = −17.31, r = −0.51; p < 0.001).

(5)

Authors Replacing: Authors would like to change 4 parts of the table content, so we need to replace the original Table 4 in Section 4.1 “Descriptive Statistics for Independent Variables” on page 11:

Table 4.
Frequencies for categorical IVs and DVs.

Table 4.
Frequencies for categorical IVs and DVs.

Variable Name Category Frequencies %
(n = 1364)
IV SEX Female 477 34.97
Male 258 18.91
No answer 73 5.35
IV FEE ESD in School 633 46.40
No ESD in School 254 18.60
DV PPRCURRENT Yes 631 46.30
No 170 12.50
DV PPRFUTURE Yes 712 52.20
No 122 8.90

Table 4.
Frequencies for categorical IVs and DVs.

Table 4.
Frequencies for categorical IVs and DVs.

Variable Name Category Frequencies %
(n = 1364)
IV SEX Female 851 62.39
Male 440 32.26
No answer 73 5.35
IV FEE ESD in School 633 46.40
No ESD in School 254 18.60
DV PPRCURRENT Yes 631 46.30
No 170 12.50
DV PPRFUTURE Yes 712 52.20
No 122 8.90

The authors and the Editorial Office would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers, and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original article has been updated.

[ad_2]

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More