Disabilities | Free Full-Text | Living through the Pandemic with a Disability: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study
1. Introduction
3. Results
3.1. Demographics
Thirteen individuals participated in the study. Eight participants reported their sex as female, six reported their gender as woman, five reported their gender as man, and two indicated they were non-binary. The average age of participants was 55.76 (SD = 16.72). Most participants (n = 7) had some college or university education; four attended graduate school, one graduated from college or university, and one participant attended high school. Only one participant reported mental disability, and the rest reported physical disability (n = 12). Regarding living situations, nine participants lived alone, and only four participants lived with a family member. The number of participants who were born in Canada was 11. Most participants in our study were either retired (n = 4) or received disability assistance (n = 4). The remaining participants were students (n = 1), self-employed (n = 2), or had other types of employment (n = 2). Pseudonyms have been used in this section to preserve the confidentiality of participants.
3.2. Final Codes and Themes and Their Development
3.3. Being an Active Agent in Changing How Things Are Done in the Face of COVID Restrictions
I prefer to put it on once when I leave the house and then take it off once when I come home again. Which means that I am one of those people seen in open outdoor spaces still wearing the mask.
Participants recounted adaptations to their lives based on the restrictions. For example, Wendy, 31 years old, at T3 explained her attempts to see others in person when possible while still following guidelines: “My church did a ‘staycation’. So, with physical distancing in bubbles, wearing masks, and everything. We did a scavenger hunt, went for a quote-in-quote, ‘hike’”.
Another change participants made was the new or increased use of technologies such as ZoomTM to connect with others. This new long-demanded change became possible for people with disabilities due to the restrictions forcing everyone to use online tools to communicate, and therefore, people with disabilities can also increase the use of online tools in their everyday lives. As described by Amy, 40 years old, who pointed out how they used technology to stay connected with the LGBTQ+ community at T1, “All the pride events were going to be in person, and it’s only because we can’t have large crowds gathering that we’re doing it online”.
The previously mentioned change becomes more important when compared with the fact that people with disabilities asked for online tools to participate in work and social events; however, because the general public did not have the same needs before the pandemic, the need for people with disabilities to work online and use online tools was ignored. The comparison of society’s response to the general public’s needs during the pandemic results in comparing the societal responses to people with disabilities with the societal responses to able-bodied people during the pandemic at T1. Pauline, 35 years old, at T1, expressed her frustration at society’s slow responses to people with disabilities by indicating, “People making all of these changes to society and space in order to protect their health when disabled people have been asking for changes and have been told that these changes aren’t possible”. However, to a lesser extent, participants empathized with others based on what they saw and heard of others’ experiences during the pandemic. This included acts of violence due to sex, race, or enforcement of government-imposed regulations.
Empathizing with others was mainly observed in T1 and was rarely used in the remaining time points. This sub-theme explains the ability of people with disabilities to consider what others are going through while they were considered an at-risk group during the pandemic. Participants described ways they provided support for others during the pandemic, albeit they were not volunteering in their roles prior to the pandemic. Some participants described checking in and picking up groceries for neighbors and friends. For example, Mary, 69 years old, at T4 explained:
My friend, I was friend with friends with a family, basically. He, the husband, died, was dying of cancer, so I was helping them out a lot. I go shopping for them. So when COVID hit, I continued doing that for them and keep giving her support and keeping him company and just hanging around, so I’ve continued to do that after he died.
Others described how services such as grocery delivery provided support for them during this time, as Emma, 60 years old, at T1, recounted the support she received from others by saying, “There’s some specific groups here on the [location] and some Facebook groups that are willing to help if you need it. Pick things up and shop for you”. The number of times people brought up receiving support from others in the community did not increase substantially from T1 to T4. While receiving and providing support were eventually used less to code participants’ interviews, a bigger reduction was observed in receiving support from others as time progressed.
Throughout the pandemic, the government consistently asked people to keep their social circles small. T2 interviews showed a new subtheme that described participants’ attempts to define their social bubbles. This subtheme described participants’ efforts in defining their social bubbles and keeping those in their social bubbles safe. A negative case of “using technologies to connect with more people” also emerged at T2 as participants described “Zoom fatigue” and “not wanting to connect with people online”.
The subtheme “not perceiving major changes in life” emerged as a negative case in this theme and described how some participants did not identify changes in their lives due to pandemic restrictions. While this subtheme has not been used frequently, it remained stable from T1 to T4. To describe not experiencing major changes in life, Henry, 68 years old, at T1, said, “I took it as a bit of a joke because it looked like everybody was gonna have to do what I do, spend a lot of time at home and you can’t do much and all the rest of it”. This sentiment was evident across all time points.
3.4. Pandemic Restrictions Wreak Havoc
Another emerging theme was “Pandemic restrictions wreak havoc”. As time passed and BC moved towards reopening, we observed a reduction in the use of the subthemes under this theme. The highest number of times that subthemes under this theme were used was at T1, T3, and T4. There was a reduction in using this subtheme at T2, which was during phase 2 of BC reopening when some restrictions were temporarily lifted.
One of the most frequent subthemes at T1 described participants limitations in going to hair salons, traveling, or meeting with doctors and health professionals at all timepoints. For example, George, 59 years old, at T3, disclosed his frustration about the restrictions and ongoing closure of the services by indicating, “I cann’t go up shopping for anything, I managed to make her a card, but that was it, but hadn’t gotten her anything”. While some of these restrictions affected all people in Canada, some, including visiting doctors and health care professionals, had serious implications for people with disabilities and speak of an important need of this group that was not met immediately by societal reactions, especially at the beginning of the pandemic.
Furthermore, participants described various negative emotions (including anxiety and isolation) that they experienced during the pandemic. Due to the restrictions, such as those on visitors to hospitals, participants felt anxious and isolated during the lockdown. With regards to restrictions on hospital visitors, Mary at T4 expressed frustration about the people who are dying alone in the hospital by explaining, “They won’t let anybody in. They’ll only let one family member a day in, which is horrible for people, and I figure, call me cynical, but people are dying anyway… let them be with their family”.
The pandemic restrictions led to a feeling of isolation and internal turmoil that caused anxiety as participants expressed the desire to be a part of significant events and milestones such as family picnics and birthdays but also wanted to stay safe. In their interviews, participants emphasized the importance of relationships and the ways in which they tried to maintain those relationships. Mary summed up her experience regarding social life during the pandemic, explaining, “maintain your social connections as best you can through the Internet …, you know, no hugging…” The restrictions in place due to the pandemic caused participants to struggle both with finding ways to connect with people outside their homes and with finding ways to live with people within their homes. Amy at T3 described her concerns about the well-being of other family members by saying, “You can really only worry about yourself at the end of the day… I can worry about my parents too”. Even when participants left their homes, they experienced challenges with other people related to what they saw and what others said to them. Joseph at T3 described the experience of going out as “strange… it seems like everyone on public transit now are all afraid of each other…”.
Another subtheme commonly used in this theme was struggling with societal responses to the pandemic. Specifically, participants divulged stories of how the policies implemented during the pandemic highlighted the inequities within society and affected people disproportionately depending on age, disability status, and economic status. Amy at T3 shared her opinion on how the pandemic affected some families with children more than others and explained how society did not support families who did not have resources to provide care for their children on their own:
There’s people who already have someone at home who can stay with the kid or people who can afford tutors, and then I’ve heard of a couple of families within my connections who, the one of the parents is gonna quit their job to homeschool the child.
Other participants experienced accessibility barriers, which are defined as any barriers that prevent people with disabilities from fully and equally participating in society (The Accessible BC ACT). In our sample, there were both participants who expressed gratitude for the British Columbian response to COVID-19, as captured by the subtheme “happy with the BC response,” and participants who were feeling frustrated with what was happening. Related to social inequality, Emma at T3 pointed out:
I don’t know how you might determine the need of someone who is disabled or at high risk, medical conditions. They absolutely don’t have a choice. That can’t get out and get groceries. Those are the ones that should be prioritized for deliveries. And I’m just really surprised that wasn’t.
3.5. Trying to Be Resilient in the Face of the Pandemic
Participants were challenged both by self-imposed restrictions and government-imposed pandemic related restrictions. Participants described being less busy and less motivated to complete their tasks initially, whereas at T4, the related subtheme was not used at all. For example, Mary at T1 reported, “The biggest one is motivation. Motivation to do the things that I know I might really enjoy doing. But just getting started at anything that that is, that’s probably the hardest thing still I’m having to do deal with”.
While participants’ initial responses indicated they are less busy and have less work to do, they explained vigorous attempts to fill the time by learning new skills and starting up old hobbies. For example, Wendyat at T1, in response to how she is filling her time reported:
I’m doing new things about technology, go for my own work, so I think I am already familiar with Zoom and whatnot, but speaking more familiar and change tools for online teaching. I also have learned about redesigning business model.
While the significant peak in learning new hobbies was during T1 and the usage of that subtheme eventually reduced, even at T4, some participants acknowledged new attempts to learn new hobbies and fill their time; for example, Joseph at T4 explained: “I’ve been painting more. I was doing collages that were, I thought, a progression of the way I like to do art”.
Participants also described numerous efforts to stay healthy, both mentally and physically, by staying active and practicing spirituality. One strategy that participants used to foster resilience was to experientially enjoy day-to-day activities. For example, participants described enjoying family time and cooking. Participants also described enjoying what they were allowed to do, using activities to their advantage, and utilizing physical activities such as kayaking to connect with others. For example, John, 81 years old, at T2, pointed out:
I guess going out and just moving around more, so that’s pretty good for well-being, I guess. Getting more active again, so floorball helps, a little bit of tennis helps. I think the floorball thing helped a lot. That’s being more active than just moving around.
Joseph at T4 explained how he is trying to improve his mental well-being by taking new courses:
Actually, I’m taking a mindfulness-based cognitive therapy course. So just this week, in the third week of the course, you do three 3 min meditations every day. So I start my day with a meditation and end my day with a meditation.
Another subtheme that has been used the most was related to participants’ gratitude for their circumstances at all time points. They attributed their ability to cope with the numerous changes to the several privileges that they had. For example, Wendy at T1 disclosed:
I can’t really say that; like you said, I do live alone on the mainland, so I imagine I might experience more loneliness the way that a lot of people are. I’m quite content to spend time alone, but this is a long, long time. So I think that might have been different. I also like the place that I live on the island. I can go outside and, on the farm, and lots of space and [there is] quiet road near where we live, so I’ve been going for a lot of walks and maybe even walking more than I normally do.
Another sub-theme primarily observed during T1 and suddenly used less often after is related to facing challenges and developing resilience. For example, John at T1 explained, “I accept those as being disruptions, and I’m hopeful that COVID will go away sometime, and they won’t be there. But there’s nothing much I can do about them now”.
Participants spoke of being optimistic that pre-COVID-19 life might resume throughout the four time points. Some participants spoke hopefully of plans such as travel and attending music festivals. Other participants spoke of developing a mindset that allowed them to live life daily to foster the hope they needed to get through the pandemic. “Being optimistic about resuming pre-COVID-19 life after the pandemic” was used more at T4. For example, Henry at T4 described, “Maybe it’ll be like flu and you get a flu shot. And that’s what you do. You get the latest viral shot with your flu shot, maybe, it’ll all be good”.
Finally, the subtheme “positive perceptions about reopening” emerged in the second round of interviews and was observed a few times afterwards. These reflections included thoughts about experiencing some level of normalcy and feeling content about restarting previous activities and meeting others in person. Some participants had reservations embedded within their reflections on reopening, though, as they did not feel comfortable going to public places. The reflections included redefining what was normal and getting used to the new normal.
4. Discussions
This study had some limitations. The first interview happened during the first lockdown in British Columbia, and therefore, we do not have information on the participants’ life experiences before the pandemic. Our sample was restricted to residents of British Columbia; this is an important consideration when transferring the findings to other jurisdictions. While this study had some limitations, it also had several strengths. By recruiting a sample of participants who self-identified as people with disabilities, the sample included a wide range of physical and psychological disabilities. Furthermore, the longitudinal nature of this study allowed us to follow up with participants for almost a year after the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. This provided an opportunity to observe the variations in participants’ lives during the first year of the pandemic and how they adapted to the changes in their lives. In addition, our findings highlighted the importance of the perception of equality in the lives of individuals with disabilities and their request to have the same opportunities as others during and after the end of the pandemic. Finally, our study pointed out the critical aspects of optimism and hope. While this study cannot determine the optimal level of optimism and hope, policymakers and health care providers need to be careful about the nature of the messages they convey to the public, especially to people with disabilities.
Our team at Inergency is excited to announce our partnership with @Disasters Expo Europe, the leading event in disaster management.
Join us on the 15th &16th of May at the Messe Frankfurt to explore the latest solutions shaping disaster preparation, response and recovery.
To all our members, followers, and subscribers in the industry, This is YOUR opportunity to explore the intersection of sustainability and disaster management, connect with industry leaders, and stay at the forefront of emergency preparedness.
Don't miss out! Secure your complimentary tickets now and be part of the conversation driving innovation in disaster resilience. ➡️ https://lnkd.in/dNuzyQEh
And in case you missed it, here is our ultimate road trip playlist is the perfect mix of podcasts, and hidden gems that will keep you energized for the entire journey