Green Human Resource Management/Supply Chain Management/Regulation and Legislation and Their Effects on Sustainable Development Goals in Jordan
[ad_1]
1. Introduction
2. Aim
This study aims to enhance the theoretical framework and address the literature gap by analyzing existing research articles related to GHRM, GSCM, and regulation and legislation, and their connection to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Jordan. From a theoretical perspective, GHRM, GSCM, and regulation and legislation research is still in its infant stage and needs more exploration and development. Although scholars in each of these fields are advancing the roles of Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM), GHRM, and regulation and legislation, there has been a notable delay in the integration of these three contemporary subjects, particularly due to a significant gap in the integration of GHRM, GSCM, and regulation and legislation. Thus, this article emphasizes the implications of GHRM, GSCM, and regulation and legislation integration for scholars, managers, and practitioners within the realm of organizational sustainability in Jordan. Furthermore, the framework for GHRM, GSCM, and regulation and legislation can give a solution for the barriers to implementation.
This aim can be achieved through the following objectives:
-
Critically analyze a review of the relevant literature.
-
Propose a model to fit Jordanian requirements.
-
Present the conclusion and recommendations for further research work.
-
Identify and examine the motivators and barriers.
Therefore, the central aim of this study is to answer the following research question: “How can GHRM, GSCM, and Regulation and Legislation in Jordan be developed to achieve SDGs?”. This study also aims to answer the following research sub-questions:
-
How do GHRM and GSCM practices contribute to or hinder the achievement of SDGs in Jordan?
-
What is the existing regulatory framework in Jordan concerning sustainability and how does it impact businesses in terms of GHRM and SCM?
-
What are the main obstacles faced by organizations in Jordan when attempting to integrate GHRM and GSCM practices?
-
How do regulatory constraints pose challenges to the effective implementation of sustainable practices?
-
How do existing regulations and legislation in Jordan support or hinder the adoption of GHRM and GSCM?
-
To what extent can the integration GHRM and GSCM contribute to the achievement of specific SDGs in Jordan?
-
Are there discernible economic, social, and environmental benefits for organizations aligning their practices with SDGs?
-
What are the barriers and key drivers of implementing GHRM and GSCM in Jordan?
3. Research Methodology
The first step was to conduct a database search using specific keywords related to government regulations and legislations, Green HRM (GHRM), and Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM) in Jordan. The same keywords were used for a reference search in the second step. The chosen keywords allowed the researchers to group the selected papers into three categories: government regulations and legislations, GHRM, and GSCM.
For the search on GHRM, keywords such as “sustainable HRM,” “green HR,” “GHRM practices,” “sustainability and HR,” “SDGs and GHRM,” “SDGs and GHRM practices,” “GHRM and GSCM,” and “Pillars of sustainability and GHRM” were used. Similarly, keywords like “sustainable SCM,” “green SCM,” “GSCM practices,” “sustainability and SC,” “SDGs and GSCM,” “SDGs and GSCM practices,” “GSCM and GHRM,” and “Pillars of sustainability and GSCM” were used for the search on GSCM.
Additional keywords such as “Regulation and SDGs,” “regulations and legislations and SDGs,” “Regulation and GHRM,” “Regulation and GSCM,” “regulations and legislations and GHRM,” and “Government regulations and legislations and GSCM” were used to cover laws and judicial decisions. Qistas and Qarark search engines, which provide access to original Jordan content including laws and judicial decisions, were also utilized.
These keywords facilitate a comprehensive exploration of the interplay between Green Human Resource Management (GHRM), Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM), regulation, legislation, and their collective influence on promoting Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). They encompass theoretical, practical, and regulatory perspectives, providing a holistic comprehension of the subject matter.
Green Human Resource Management (GHRM):
-
“Sustainable HRM” and “Green HR”: these terms directly link HR practices with sustainability goals, emphasizing environmentally conscious human resource management.
-
“GHRM practices”: this specifies a focus on the practical aspects of implementing green and sustainable HR policies.
-
“Sustainability and HR”: this highlights the integration of sustainability principles into HR functions.
-
“SDGs and GHRM,” and “SDGs and GHRM practices”: these establish the link between GHRM practices and their contribution to achieving SDGs.
-
“GHRM and GSCM”: this recognizes the interconnectedness between Green HRM and Green Supply Chain Management.
Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM):
-
“Sustainable SCM” and “Green SCM”: these highlight the environmentally friendly aspects of supply chain management.
-
“GSCM practices”: this focuses on practical sustainability strategies within supply chain management.
-
“Sustainability and SC”: this connects sustainability principles with broader supply chain management.
-
“SDGs and GSCM,” and “SDGs and GSCM practices”: these demonstrate the alignment between GSCM practices and SDGs.
-
“GSCM and GHRM”: this acknowledges the integration of Green Supply Chain Management with Green Human Resource Management.
Regulation and Legislation:
-
“Regulation and SDGs,” and “Regulations and legislations and SDGs”: these explore how regulations and legislations impact or contribute to the achievement of SDGs.
-
“Regulation and GHRM,” and “Regulation and GSCM”: these investigate the influence of regulations on Green HRM and Green Supply Chain Management.
-
“Regulations and legislations and GHRM,” and “Government regulations and legislations and GSCM”: this explore the regulatory landscape and its impact on Green HRM and Green Supply Chain Management practices.
In the review and assessment process, the journal articles under consideration were published between 2016 and 2023. The selection of the years 2016 and 2023 is significant due to key developments in Jordan’s commitment to sustainable development during this period:
-
The first and second Voluntary National Review (VNR): The VNR provided a comprehensive overview of the country’s progress and challenges in implementing the SDGs. This signified Jordan’s dedication to transparency and accountability in addressing global sustainability targets.
-
The 2023 agenda for sustainable development including 17 SDGs: the UN adopted SDGs in 2015, and in 2016, the implementation of these SDGs began.
-
Paris Agreement entry into force: The entry into force of the Paris Agreement on climate change in 2016 is another crucial factor. The Paris Agreement, adopted in 2015, represents a global commitment to combat climate change.
-
The choice of 2023 is forward-looking, allowing for an examination of Jordan’s continued efforts and advancements in sustainable development. By selecting this year, it provides an opportunity to explore updates on the implementation of sustainable practices, achievements, and challenges faced by Jordan in the years following the initial VNR, the entry into force of the Paris Agreement, and the implementation of SDGs.
In summary, the rationale behind choosing 2016 and 2023 is to capture a pivotal moment when Jordan actively engaged with the global community on sustainable development through the VNR and the Paris Agreement. The subsequent inclusion of 2023 allows for an assessment of the ongoing efforts and progress made by Jordan in the years following these critical milestones.
The search was conducted in the English language, and the sources from online databases were specifically related to the practical side of sustainability. The researchers used various sources to collect information and data from, including the following:
Overall, the theoretical framework presented here sets the stage for understanding the complex interplay between GHRM, GSCM, and regulation and legislation, and their collective influence on achieving SDGs in Jordan. Through a structured methodology, this study seeks to contribute to the advancement of knowledge in this field and provide practical insights for stakeholders in Jordan’s sustainability journey.
4. Literature Review
The literature review encompasses studies on GHRM, GSCM, and government regulations and legislation, emphasizing their individual and collective impacts on sustainable development. Furthermore, this review highlights the specific implications of these factors in Jordan’s context and their alignment with SDGs 8, 12, and 13. The literature review is divided into two parts. The first part focuses on the correlations between dependent and independent factors. The second part analyzes the main practices for each factor and the main benefits and barriers.
4.1. Correlations
4.2. Analysis
4.2.1. Sustainable Development Goals
Overall, GHRM, GSCM, and government regulations and legislations can help organizations achieve their sustainability goals while promoting economic growth, environmental protection, and social development, which are the main objectives of the UN SDGs.
4.2.2. Green Human Resource Management
Green Recruitment and Selection
Green Compensation Management (Reward Management)
Green Training and Development
Green Performance Management
4.2.3. Green Supply Chain Management
Green Purchasing
Internal Environmental Management
Green Logistics
Green Manufacturing and Packaging
Jordanian companies can assess their current level of GSCM adoption by considering the following factors:
-
Key drivers of GSCM adoption: companies can assess the key drivers of GSCM adoption by identifying factors such as government regulations and legislations, stakeholder pressure, global competition, financial factors, and the awareness level of customers, all of which were found to be drivers of GSCM adoption in Jordanian industrial firms [27,88].
-
GSCM practices in the industry: companies can assess their GSCM practices by analyzing their processes in relation to green supplier selection, green purchasing, green production, green design, green distribution, and reverse logistics, all of which were identified as key GSCM practices in Jordanian manufacturing firms [65].
-
Intellectual capital: companies can assess the impact of intellectual capital on GSCM adoption by considering the impact of GSCM dimensions, such as green IT, green manufacturing and packaging, green storing, green purchasing, and green marketing, on the quality of services in renewable energy companies in Jordan [66].
4.2.4. Government Regulations and Legislations
Labor Rights
Economic Diversification
Reducing Unemployment
Investment in Human Capital
Moreover, redirecting investments toward new projects and industries in the environmental sector increases the demand for the workforce and expands employment opportunities. Finally, directing investments toward environmentally friendly projects enhances environmental safety and protects natural resources, thus contributing to sustainable development.
Environmental Protection
Sustainable Consumption and Production
Climate Change
5. Results, Discussion, and Limitations
SDGs are not legally binding, but countries are expected to take ownership and establish a national framework for achieving the 17 goals. Therefore, more action is needed to achieve sustainability in Jordan. Regulation and legislation can be a pillar for sustainability and a powerful force in driving sustainable practices. It can help to reduce environmental risks and promote sustainability by addressing the linkages between society, the environment, the economy, regulation, and sustainability. Therefore, regulation can be an important pillar for sustainability by setting standards and incentivizing sustainable practices. Governments around the globe are increasingly issuing regulations, guidance, and incentives related to sustainability, and environmental and social governance. However, government regulations and legislations alone are not enough to achieve the SDGs. They must be accompanied by effective policies, programs, and partnerships that involve all stakeholders, including governments, civil society, and the private sector. Also, environmental inspection and control are important components of ensuring compliance with environmental laws and regulations.
Jordan has made progress toward achieving some of the SDGs, but more needs to be done to meet the targets by 2030, and actions more than just regulation and legislation are needed. Therefore, while regulation and legislation are important components of achieving sustainability in Jordan, they must be accompanied by other measures such as efficient implementation, comprehensive and evolutionary reforms, commitment to sustainability measures, and sector-specific approaches. GHRM and GSCM, with the enforcement and incentives of regulations and legislation, can help Jordan achieve the SDGs, such as decent work, responsible consumption and production, and climate action.
The investigation into the development of GHRM, GSCM, and the existing regulatory and legislative framework in Jordan with the overarching aim of achieving the SDGs has yielded valuable insights and raised critical considerations.
The findings suggest that the integration of GHRM and GSCM practices can significantly contribute to the advancement of the SDGs in Jordan. Organizations that adopt sustainable human resource and supply chain practices tend to exhibit positive impacts on environmental preservation, social equity, and economic sustainability. The analysis further indicates that a proactive approach to aligning these practices with the existing regulatory and legislative landscape is crucial for fostering a sustainable business environment.
Based on the findings of this study, it is recommended that organizations in Jordan adopt and implement GHRM and GSCM practices to improve their environmental performance. This can include practices such as green training and development, green performance management, green purchasing, and green logistics. Furthermore, it is important for the government to continue to enforce regulations and legislation that promote sustainable development and protect the environment. This can include measures such as promoting investment in renewable energy and ensuring equal pay for work of equal value. Organizations can also prioritize green recruitment and onboarding practices to facilitate the adoption of GSCM practices. Additionally, incorporating green training into organizational policies can improve employee commitment toward the environment and contribute to sustainable workplace practice.
The discussion reveals several key pathways for the development of GHRM, GSCM, and regulatory and legislative frameworks in Jordan to better support the achievement of the SDGs. Collaboration between businesses, government bodies, and non-governmental organizations is essential for creating a conducive environment for the implementation of sustainable practices. Additionally, the promotion of awareness and education regarding the benefits of GHRM and GSCM can play a pivotal role in fostering a culture of sustainability among stakeholders. Strategic partnerships between the private sector and regulatory bodies are identified as a potential avenue for driving policy reforms that align with international sustainability standards. The discussion underscores the importance of creating incentives and recognition mechanisms to motivate organizations to adopt and adhere to green practices, enhancing their commitment to sustainable development.
Despite the strengths of this study, there are additional limitations that should be acknowledged. Firstly, the research is inherently context-specific to Jordan and may not be directly applicable to other regions with distinct socio-economic, cultural, and regulatory landscapes. Additionally, the dynamic nature of regulatory environments and business practices introduces an element of temporal sensitivity, emphasizing the need for continuous monitoring and adaptation. This study’s scope may not comprehensively cover all potential variables influencing the development of GHRM, GSCM, and regulatory frameworks in Jordan. As such, further research is warranted to explore additional factors that may impact the successful implementation of sustainable practices. Furthermore, it would be valuable to explore other dimensions that may influence green entrepreneurial activity and sustainable development. Secondly, this study relied on secondary data for the period 2016–2023 and from a specific database; future studies should consider a wider time span and more databases to enable long-term analyses and enhance overall knowledge. Such an approach will have dynamic effects, revealing different or similar entrepreneurial responses when institutional factors change in developing countries.
Based on the identified limitations, future research should aim to delve deeper into the intricacies of stakeholder collaboration and assess the effectiveness of specific incentive structures in promoting sustainable practices. Comparative studies across different industries and regions could provide a more nuanced understanding of the diverse challenges and opportunities associated with the development of GHRM, GSCM, and regulatory frameworks. It would be worthwhile for future studies to extend the analysis to include cross-country comparisons, such as examining other regions within the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Future research should use another approach and another environment to improve the quality and scope of the indicators, for both dependent as well as independent variables. The limitations of this study include the need for further empirical evidence and critical analysis to fully understand the interconnectedness between green supply chain management, green human resource practices, and government regulations in promoting sustainable development in Jordan. Additionally, this study acknowledges the need for more research to address the identified limitations and to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of these factors on SDGs 8, 12, and 13. Furthermore, this study could benefit from more in-depth case studies and real-world examples to demonstrate the practical application and effectiveness of the proposed conceptual framework. These limitations highlight the potential for future research to build upon the current findings and provide a more robust understanding of the subject matter.
In conclusion, this study highlights the pivotal role of GHRM, GSCM, and regulatory and legislative frameworks in driving sustainable development in Jordan. By addressing the identified limitations and building upon the insights gained, future endeavors can further refine strategies for fostering a holistic and effective approach to achieving SDGs through integrated green practices.
[ad_2]