Preconception Health of Indigenous Peoples in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States: A Scoping Review

[ad_1]

This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.

Review

by

Clara Walker

1,2,*,
Tahmina Begum

1,
Jacqueline A Boyle

3,
James Ward

1 and
Federica Barzi

1

1

UQ Poche Centre for Indigenous Health, The University of Queensland, Toowong, QLD 4066, Australia

2

Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia

3

Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, VIC 3128, Australia

*

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21(3), 345; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21030345 (registering DOI)

Submission received: 1 December 2023
/
Revised: 23 February 2024
/
Accepted: 28 February 2024
/
Published: 14 March 2024

Abstract

Background: There is increasing recognition of the importance of the preconception period for addressing reproductive and intergenerational health inequities and supporting improved maternal and child health outcomes. This study aimed to understand the extent and type of evidence that exists in relation to preconception health for Indigenous peoples living in high-income countries with similar experiences of colonisation, namely, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and the United States. Methods: This review was conducted as per the JBI methodology and PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. A comprehensive search of PubMed, CINAHL [EBSCO], Ovid Embase, Scopus, and the Wiley Cochrane Library was conducted using keywords and index terms. We included research in English published between January 2010 and June 2023 on quantitative and qualitative primary studies. Data were extracted using a standardised tool, and the analysis included quantitative descriptions and qualitative content analysis. Results: We identified 360 potential studies and included 57 articles in the review. Most studies were from the United States (n = 36, 63.2%) and Australia (n = 13, 22.8%), and they commonly reported associations between preconception health risk factors and maternal or child health outcomes (n = 27, 48.2%) or described the development, implementation, or evaluation of preconception health interventions (n = 26, 46.4%). Common preconception health areas were pre-pregnancy body mass index or weight (n = 34), alcohol (n = 16), diet (n = 14), physical activity (n = 12), and diabetes (n = 11). Most studies focused exclusively on women (n = 46, 80.7%), and very few included men (n = 3, 5.3%). The study populations were mostly urban and rural (n = 25, 43.9%) or rural only (n = 14, 24.6%); however, the geographical remoteness was often unclear (n = 14, 24.6%). Conclusions: While there was some research relating to the preconception health of Indigenous peoples, this review identified considerable research gaps. There is a need for dedicated research into preconception health risk factors and reproductive health outcomes, attitudes and awareness of preconception health, and preconception health interventions for Indigenous peoples.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Walker, C.; Begum, T.; Boyle, J.A.; Ward, J.; Barzi, F.
Preconception Health of Indigenous Peoples in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States: A Scoping Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21, 345.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21030345

AMA Style

Walker C, Begum T, Boyle JA, Ward J, Barzi F.
Preconception Health of Indigenous Peoples in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2024; 21(3):345.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21030345

Chicago/Turabian Style

Walker, Clara, Tahmina Begum, Jacqueline A Boyle, James Ward, and Federica Barzi.
2024. “Preconception Health of Indigenous Peoples in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States: A Scoping Review” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 21, no. 3: 345.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21030345

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.

[ad_2]

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More