JPM | Free Full-Text | Non-Pharmacological Intervention for Personalizing Sleep Quality through Gentle Rocking Motion
[ad_1]
1. Introduction
While achieving restorative sleep is essential for overall well-being and daytime functionality, it often presents a challenge. Occasional sleep difficulties are widespread, affecting approximately one-third of the adult population [1]. Impaired sleep is linked to diminished quality of life and physical complaints, such as fatigue, headaches, dry and irritated eyes, or weight gain. It also impairs cognitive function and has a negative impact on emotion regulation. Poor sleep quality has been indicated to correlate with systemic inflammation and subclinical arterial diseases, and has been linked to the occurrence of heart failure in general populations, an unfavourable prognosis in patients with coronary disease, and overall mortality in a male general population [2,3,4,5].
Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention revealed a consistent decrease in mean sleep duration and an increase in the percentage of adults sleeping ≤6 h per day between 1985 and 2012. This trend underscores the influence of social, lifestyle, and environmental factors on sleep patterns [6]. Given the rising prevalence of sleep-related issues and their implications for health and well-being, effective treatment of sleep disturbances is highly pertinent [7,8,9].
Pharmacological treatments pose a significant risk of dependency and frequently result in sedation the subsequent day, elevating the likelihood of falls and hip fractures, especially in the elderly population [10,11]. Considering these effects, non-pharmacological interventions are gaining interest. Relaxation techniques, warm feet, and music are popular methods in the general population to improve sleep quality [12]. The outcomes of a review and meta-analysis, which evaluated interventions including exercise, aromatherapy, acupressure, cognitive behavioural therapy, and meditation, indicated statistically significant effects on sleep [13].
Additionally, what prompts us to gently hold infants or succumb effortlessly to sleep in a hammock? While these uncomplicated actions are prevalent among various cultures and have persisted through generations, the underlying connection between the act of rocking and its influence on sleep remains inadequately comprehended.
Gentle rocking motions as a form of vestibular stimulation have emerged as a promising non-pharmacological option [14,15]. The utilization of vestibular stimulation has been explored as a soothing and calming intervention in the context of treating diverse psychiatric and neurological conditions [16]. Various studies have approached the connection between vestibular stimulation and sleep. It has been suggested that passive motions could be used to modify and potentially enhance sleep patterns.
Kompotis et al., in his study regarding an animal model, explored the impact of rocking on sleep by focusing on the vestibular system’s role. In this animal study, mice underwent continuous rocking for 12 h through a horizontally moving platform. The findings indicated that at the ‘optimal’ rate of 1 Hz, mice exhibited increased an NREM sleep duration compared to wakefulness, and rocking also hastened the onset of sleep [17].
The in-depth investigation into the impact of rocking on infant sleep originated in the 1970s and 1980s, utilizing oscillating waterbeds. Early studies yielded promising results, indicating that rocking expedited the initiation of sleep and fostered more extended, uninterrupted periods of rest [18].
The most complex diagnostic tool in sleep medicine is represented by polysomnography, a comprehensive sleep study that registers electroencephalography, electrooculogram, electromyogram, limb movements, heart rhythm, thoracic and abdominal respiratory effort, oxygen saturation, breath rate, and breathing patterns and monitors nasal or mouth airflow. In specially designed environments, the night can also be video-registered for a better comprehension of the events. This combination of techniques is utilized to investigate the underlying reasons behind disruptions in sleep. PSG is widely acknowledged as the golden standard for diagnosing sleep-related breathing disorders, encompassing conditions such as obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), central sleep apnoea, and sleep-related hypoventilation or hypoxia. Furthermore, PSG can also serve as a tool to assess various other sleep disorders, including nocturnal seizures, narcolepsy, periodic limb movement disorder, and rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder [19]. Sleep apnoea is a sleep disorder characterized by interruptions in breathing during sleep, leading to brief and repetitive periods of oxygen deprivation. These pauses in breathing can last for seconds to minutes and may occur multiple times throughout the night [20]. While sleep apnoea is primarily recognized as a sleep disorder characterized by breathing interruptions, emerging research suggests that it also has significant metabolic implications, classifying it as a metabolic disease. Sleep apnoea can disrupt the balance of hormones that regulate metabolism, such as insulin and cortisol. The repeated drops in oxygen levels and fragmented sleep patterns associated with sleep apnoea can contribute to insulin resistance, potentially leading to type 2 diabetes. Additionally, sleep apnoea has been linked to alterations in appetite-regulating hormones, often resulting in increased cravings for high-calorie foods. Furthermore, the chronic inflammation associated with untreated sleep apnoea may contribute to metabolic dysfunction and cardiovascular complications. Recognizing sleep apnoea as a metabolic disease underscores the importance of holistic approaches to its management, including lifestyle modifications, weight management, and addressing underlying metabolic factors. Treating sleep apnoea not only improves sleep quality but also plays a crucial role in mitigating its impact on metabolic health [21].
Studies published investigating the possible influence of rocking movements on sleep architecture (rapid eye movement (REM) and non-rapid eye movement (nREM)), respiratory function (apnoea–hypopnea index (AHI) and saturation parameters), and movement disorders are rare and have certain limits: their small sample sizes, heterogenicity in study design, variability in rocking frequency, and lack of standardized definitions of parameters used.
Our primary objective is to study the influence of an innovative experimental bed designed to generate rocking motions on sleep parameters.
3. Results
The participants (n = 60), median age 26 years with no history of sleep disorders, spent one night in the normal bed and one night in the Inoveris dispositive. The results are presented in Table 1. The parameters are categorized into four groups: sleep stage (min), representing the duration of each sleep stage; sleep stage (%), indicating the percentage of each sleep stage relative to the total sleep length; sleep latencies, denoting the time taken to enter specific sleep stages; and sleep indexes, encompassing sleep parameters recommended by the American Association of Sleep Medicine (AASM).
The rocking bed demonstrated a statistically significant increase in total sleep time (TST), with a notably reduced duration of N1 sleep stages (p < 0.001). Additionally, subjects experienced a significant decrease in the latency for entering an N2 sleep stage (p = 0.01), highlighting a quicker transition from wakefulness to a deeper sleep state. Rocking also resulted in a higher percentage of N1 sleep stages (p = 0.01) and a significant increase in N3 sleep stage duration (p = 0.004). While some results did not reach statistical significance, it is important to note notable trends in the rocking bed group that could still be of clinical relevance. The rocking bed demonstrated a consistent improvement in sleep parameters, showcasing an increased total sleep time (TST) compared to the normal bed. Furthermore, the rocking bed exhibited a trend towards higher sleep efficiency (SE) and sleep duration percentage, reflecting a potential enhancement in overall sleep quality.
4. Discussion
Our investigation into the influence of rocking movements on sleep architecture yielded significant insights, aligning with and extending upon findings from prior studies. Perault et al.’s study involving 18 healthy participants revealed a notable increase in the duration of the N3 sleep stage during nights with rocking, consistent with our observations. This augmentation in deep sleep stages suggests a potential enhancement in sleep quality and restorative functions [23].
In parallel, Baek et al.’s exploration of rocking movements during three-hour naps in 15 young patients showed similarities to our findings, particularly regarding the increased duration of deep sleep (N3) and a significant reduction in the N1 stage (p 24].
The study by Bayer et al. including 12 male patients, focusing on the effects of reclining on a gently oscillating bed, parallels our findings of a facilitated transition from wakefulness to sleep, prolonged duration of N2 sleep stages, and an increased spindle density (p 14].
However, a nuanced perspective emerges when considering the study by Sluijs et al. in a study of 22 young patients, which investigated the effects of rocking beds with varying intensity on naps (45 min). While our results echoed a trend towards increased consolidated sleep during movement naps, this effect did not reach statistical significance. The absence of discernible differences in slow waves and sleep spindles during stage N3 suggests a complex relationship between rocking intensity and sleep architecture, warranting further exploration [25].
However, Sluijs et al., who included 19 patients with no sleep disorders and a mean age of 66.7 years, assessed the influence of an entire night of sleep in a rocking bed and provided contrasting findings. Unlike our study, they did not observe enhancements in sleep onset, increased deep sleep, or a rise in the quantity or density of sleep spindles. The diminished depth of sleep and the tendency towards a decrease in spindle amplitude, without impacting memory performance, highlighted the variability in outcomes associated with rocking bed stimulation [26].
The clinical relevance of our study lies in its contribution to sleep science and non-pharmacological interventions. Improved sleep parameters and enhanced sleep architecture with rocking motions suggest the potential utility of this non-invasive approach for addressing sleep disturbances. Our findings, particularly the positive effects on sleep architecture, pave the way for further exploration into personalized sleep interventions. Deeper sleep stages, such as N3, are known for their restorative functions, aligning with the observed improvements in our study. As sleep quality is pivotal for overall well-being, our insights may inform future therapeutic strategies, emphasizing the potential of rocking interventions in improving sleep outcomes.
Practical applications of these findings in clinical settings involve understanding the neural connections established by vestibular and sensory receptors with cortical structures associated with emotions. These connections play a role in various sleep aspects, and the inputs from vestibular or somatosensory systems facilitated by rocking movements may influence sleep control centres. Our study contributes to the unravelling of these mechanisms, enhancing our understanding of the clinical applications of rocking motions in managing sleep-related challenges [27,28,29,30]. Notably, Omlin et al.’s study on memory performance improvement over a night of sleep with lateral rocking movements provides additional support for the clinical potential of rocking interventions, particularly in individuals with poor baseline sleep [15].
These collective findings underscore the multifaceted nature of the impact of rocking motions on sleep architecture. While our results align with some studies, variations in outcomes across different investigations emphasize the need for more comprehensive research to elucidate the factors contributing to the effectiveness of rocking beds in promoting restful and restorative sleep. Future studies should consider variations in rocking intensity, duration, and individual differences to provide a more nuanced understanding of this promising area in sleep science.
5. Limitations
Despite the valuable insights gained from our study, several limitations should be acknowledged. The first limitation is represented by the small sample size. This limitation could impact the generalizability of our findings to broader populations. The small sample size might not fully capture the diversity present in larger, more heterogeneous populations. Consequently, caution should be exercised when extrapolating our results to different age groups, health conditions, or cultural backgrounds.
Secondly, the inclusion of participants from diverse age groups and health statuses, as observed in the referenced studies, introduces variability that may affect the consistency of observed effects. The potential differences in sleep patterns and responses to rocking interventions among participants with varying health conditions or age ranges could influence the generalizability of our results. Addressing this limitation could involve conducting more targeted studies focusing on specific age groups or health conditions to provide a clearer understanding of how rocking motions impact different populations. The subjective nature of sleep experiences and the potential influence of individual preferences on rocking bed efficacy further warrant consideration. Sleep experiences can vary significantly among individuals, and personal preferences may affect the perception of the rocking intervention. This subjectivity introduces variability that could impact the reproducibility of results across different individuals. Future studies may benefit from incorporating objective measures and exploring the role of individual preferences in more detail to enhance the reliability of the findings. Furthermore, the lack of standardized definitions and protocols in the existing literature makes direct comparisons challenging. Future studies should address these limitations by employing larger and more homogeneous samples, incorporating objective measures, and establishing standardized methodologies.
While our investigation yielded valuable insights, several challenges should be acknowledged. Participant adherence to the rocking protocol varied, impacting the consistency of rocking intensity across sessions. Standardizing rocking movements posed a challenge, as individual preferences and expectations influenced the experience. Technical issues related to the experimental bed’s functionality also arose, requiring adjustments during the study. Furthermore, managing participant expectations regarding the potential benefits of rocking motions introduced an additional layer of complexity. These challenges, while addressed to the best extent possible, may have influenced the outcomes and should be considered in interpreting the study’s findings.
[ad_2]
